Legal Opinion
Michael Rhinehimer v. U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 28, 2015No. 13-6641PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLAY, Circuit Judge.
Defendant U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc. (“Defendant” or “USBII”) appeals from judgment following a jury trial on Plaintiff Michael Rhinehimer’s claim that he was disciplined and fired in retaliation for his complaint about fraud perpetrated on USBII customer Norbert Purcell, in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. The only issue on appeal is whether Plaintiff established that he engaged in' activity protected by § 1514A(a)(l). For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
BACKGROUND, Plaintiff filed his complaint…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Van Asdale v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Yazdian v. Conmed Endoscopic Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Jeffry Smith v. Rock-Tenn Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Carrie Braun v. Ultimate JetchartersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Tamarin Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.