Legal Opinion

Young v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 17, 1942No. 86PublishedCited by 289 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

Petitioner, a practicing physician, was convicted on eight counts of an indictment charging violation of § 6 of the Harrison Anti-Narcotic Act, as amended. That section, so far as here material, provides:

“That the provisions of this Act shall not be construed to apply to the manufacture, sale, distribution, giving away, dispensing, or possession of preparations and remedies which do not contain more than two grains of opium ... in one fluid ounce . . .: Provided, That such remedies and preparations are manufactured, sold, distributed, given away, dispensed, or possessed as medicines and not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Parlton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
  2. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by289 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Garcia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Jean v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

284 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API