Legal Opinion

Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 30, 1981PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

HANDLER, J.

Plaintiff, Elmer Freund, suffered extensive second and third degree burns in an industrial accident at his employer’s paint manufacturing plant. At the time of the accident, Freund was assisting two fellow employees in preparing a large paint mixer for cleaning. As one of the workers swept a commercial chemical dust, nitrocellulose, from the area of the mixer, the chemicals suddenly ignited.

*233Plaintiff and his wife, Carol, brought this action claiming compensatory and punitive damages against several individuals and corporations, including…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Phillips v. Kimwood MacHine CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Cepeda v. Cumberland Engineering Company, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  5. Hamilton v. HardyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. Feldman v. Lederle LaboratoriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. H. Rosenblum, Inc. v. AdlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. Dambacher by Dambacher v. MallisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Beshada v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1982

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API