Legal Opinion
Minneapolis Auto Auction, Ltd. v. Spicer Auto Sales, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1989No. C6-88-490PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Justice.
Tri-State Insurance Company, a corporate surety on a motor vehicle dealer’s license bond maintained by Spicer Auto Sales, Inc., obtained further review of a decision of the court of appeals reversing the summary judgment entered in its favor in the trial court. The appellate court determined that claims filed against the bond by Minneapolis Auto Auction, Inc. and Alamo Rent-A-Car, Inc. (hereafter referred to collectively as Minneapolis Auto) and Mid-State Auto Auction were recoverable under Minn.Stat. § 168.27, subd. 24 (1986). We affirm.
The transactions which gave rise to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Minneapolis Auto Auction, Ltd. v. Spicer Auto Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Metro Milwaukee Auto Auction v. CoulsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Carousel Automobiles, Inc. v. GherityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Burdette Chrysler Dodge Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
- United Fire & Casualty Co. v. First Federal Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990