Legal Opinion

Pfeiffer v. Ford Motor Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1994No. C2-93-2137PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

After Frederick and June Pfeiffer were denied relief by Ford Motor Company’s informal dispute mechanism under the Minnesota Lemon Law, they sold an allegedly defective Ford F-250 pickup truck. They proceeded with an action in conciliation court approximately 75 days later and were awarded over $4,000 in damages. The district court granted Ford summary judgment on its appeal from the conciliation court, finding the Pfeiffers failed to file their action within the appropriate statute of limitations period, and denied the Pfeiffers’ motion for leave to amend their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beck v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lara v. Hyundai Motor AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Bartow v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Valenti v. Mitsubishi Motor Sales of America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Green v. BMW of North America, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  5. Highway Sales, Inc. v. Blue Bird Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API