Legal Opinion

Schaeffer v. Newberry

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 14, 1951No. 35,531PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Christianson, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered in an action to quiet title to certain real estate located within the limits of the defendant village of Elbow Lake, Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the village. The trial court found that plaintiff has no interest in the „ land in question, and that the land is owned by the village in trust for the people, to be used for park purposes only. The primary issue on appeal concerns the procedural formalities necessary for a village to validly accept a devise of land “to be used for a public park.”

The controversy involves a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Farnham v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  2. Gale v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Watkins v. BigelowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  4. Abel v. Girard Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Hames v. City of PolsonMontana Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. State v. CoerverArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Mareck v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. City of Fergus Falls v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  5. In Re Application of Mareck to Register TitleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API