Legal Opinion
NEQ, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided August 10, 2009No. 09-125CPublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALLEGRA, Judge.
This post-award bid protest is before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiff, NEQ, LLC, contends that in awarding a contract for emergency and rapid response services (ERRS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) relied upon an unstated evaluation factor and otherwise acted in an arbitrary and capricious fashion. After careful consideration of the briefs and other materials filed by the parties, the oral argument, and for the reasons discussed below, the court DENIES plaintiffs motion for judgment on the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- PlanetSpace Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Crassociates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Laboratory Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- By Light Professional IT Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.