Legal Opinion
Karim-Panahi v. U.S. Congress, Senate & House of Representatives
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 14, 2004No. 03-5186PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 84(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P.…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Salahuddin v. CuomoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Simmons v. AbruzzoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- Ficken v. GoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA, INC. v. CafesjianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Crowder v. Bierman, Geesing, and Ward LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Jenkins v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.