ARMENIAN ASSEMBLY OF AMERICA, INC. v. Cafesjian
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
The above-captioned consolidated actions involve a series of claims and counterclaims relating to the parties’ attempts to create a museum and memorial in Washington, D.C. devoted to the Armenian Genocide. Following a twelve-day bench trial in November 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion setting forth its findings of fact and conclusions of law on January 26, 2011. See [193] 1 Mem. Op. (Jan. 26, 2011). The Court found that none of the parties’ substantive claims were meritorious and dismissed all of the claims save one, holding…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- United States v. HeldtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Burke v. RegaladoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Armenian Assembly of America v. Gerard CafesjianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Philip Morris USA Inc. v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Straw v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.