Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Charest

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 6, 1941No. 3235PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

A preliminary inquiry is presented whether answer to the issue tried by the jury is in any respect determinative of the plaintiff’s liability to pay up to the policy limit any judgment which Verville may obtain against Charest. If the plaintiff is thus liable, its ensuing rights of indemnity may not be decided in this proceeding. Until it pays the possible judgment against Charest, it will have no claim for indemnity. The issue tried was submitted at Charest’s request as one which might or might not be decisive of the plaintiff’s liability, and the defendants are not precluded from asserting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rosenblum v. GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
  2. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  3. Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. KeliherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  4. Boston Ice Co. v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1913
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. BuxtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. American Mutual Insurance v. Commercial Union InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1976
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1947
  4. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. ConwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1946
  5. American Employers Insurance v. WordenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API