Legal Opinion

Boston Ice Co. v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 4, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Case, against the defendant railroad and ten insurance companies, for the use and benefit of the Queen Insurance Company of America, a duly organized corporation doing business in New Hampshire.

Read the full summary

Case, against the defendant railroad and ten insurance companies, for the use and benefit of the Queen Insurance Company of America, a duly organized corporation doing business in New Hampshire. The declaration alleges that on October 9, 1909, certain property of the Boston Ice Company located near the tracks of the defendant railroad was destroyed by fire communicated thereto by a locomotive negligently managed and operated by the defendant railroad, so as to emit an unusual and unnecessary quantity of sparks and hot coals; that the Queen Insurance Company, by reason of a poliey of insurance…

1Opinion of the CourtParsons, C. J.

“Sect. 29. The proprietors of every railroad shall be liable for all damages to any peraomoLproperty by fire or steam from any locomotive or other.enginAnponNheiFf6a’d~~
“Sect. 30. Such proprietors shall have an. insurable interest in all-property situate upon the line of their road w'nich is exposed to such damage, and they may effect insurance i hereon for Their own benefit. ~
“'SecTT‘31. Such proprie.tors^ahalLbe entitled to the benefit of any insurance effected upon sued property by the owner thereof^ less the cost of premium and, of expense of recovery. The insurance shall be deducted from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n v. MettlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. E. B. & A. C. Whiting Co. v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  2. Powell v. Catholic Medical CenterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  3. Hohm v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Burnett v. MyersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  5. New Bank of New England, N.A. v. CallahanDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API