Legal Opinion
American Employers Insurance v. Worden
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 1, 1942No. 3385PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.
The contention that the defendant who has brought suit is an insured within the provisions of the policy is met by the specific provision that such a person is not to be defined as insured.
Answer to the question accordingly depends upon the construction of the act (Laws 1937, c. 161, s. 16) providing that no motor vehicle liability policy shall be issued unless its form shall meet the requirements of the act and unless the form has received the Insurance Commissioner’s approval in its specification of a number of requirements, including that of “the limits of liability.”
It was held under the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. EganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Shelby Mutual Plate Glass & Casualty Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938
- Continental Insurance v. CharestSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
- Continental Casualty Co. v. BuxtonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. SniersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1941
3Cited by3 opinions
- Great Lakes Container Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Progressive Mutual Insurance v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Nationwide v. P.K. LindsayDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2003