Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
The following answer was returned:
1Opinion of the Court
To the Honorable Senate:
The undersigned, justices of the supreme court, having received your communication requiring their opinions upon the validity of the provisions of House Bill No. 4, now pending before your honorable body, and relating to a requirement that indemnity insurance must be obtained in certain instances as a prerequisite to obtaining a permit for the operation of a motor vehicle upon the public highways, make answer as follows:
The inquiry relates to the legislative power to provide that an applicant for registration for a motor vehicle shall establish the collectibility of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ex parte DickeyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Commonwealth v. KingsburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Ex Parte PoreskySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Escobedo v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Watson v. Division of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.