Legal Opinion

State, on Behalf of Hastings v. Denny

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1980No. 49647PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Justice.

Defendant was found by a jury to be the natural father of plaintiff’s daughter in a paternity action. He later brought a post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. The Anoka County District Court denied the post-trial motion and ordered judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals on the ground that trial court misconduct denied him a fair trial. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Plaintiff gave birth to a daughter, Larei-na, on February 19, 1975. Subsequently, plaintiff served a complaint and summons on defendant alleging that he was the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hepfel v. BashawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Hansen v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. City of Minneapolis v. CanterburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. State, on Behalf of Ortloff v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Wessels v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PiersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Block v. Target Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. State v. HagenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API