Legal Opinion
State v. Hagen
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 4, 1986No. CX-85-1675PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
The state brought a paternity action against respondent, Irvin Hagen, alleging that Hagen was the father of Karleen Wil-berg’s child. A jury returned a verdict for Hagen. The trial court denied Wilberg’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and alternatively for a new trial. We affirm.
FACTS
In January or February 1982, Karleen Wilberg and respondent Irvin Hagen engaged in sexual intercourse without using a birth control device. Wilberg gave birth on November 7, 1982.
Wilberg told her doctor her last menstrual period was February 21, 1982 from which the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- DeMars v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Cobb v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State, Ex Rel. Pula v. BeehlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- State, on Behalf of Hastings v. DennySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Estate of GrubbsMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Chisolm v. EakesMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
- Gertken v. Farmers Elevator of Kensington, Minnesota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Nash v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Republic Insurance v. Broan Manufacturing Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.