State, on Behalf of Ortloff v. Hanson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
PETERSON, Justice.
This is a paternity action brought pursuant to Minn.St. 257.251 to 257.31. Defendant, who was found by the jury to be the father, contends on this appeal that the evidence that he is the father of the child is legally insufficient, that the plaintiff’s counsel committed prejudicial misconduct in his cross-examination of defendant and another witness, that the court erred in awarding $1,775.40 in pregnancy and maintenance expenses of the mother, and that the court erred in taxing defendant $300 in expert witness fees for the testimony of the attending physician.
1. The only…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- C. M. C. ex rel. Conway v. A. P. F.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hepfel v. BashawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Owens v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- County of Hennepin Ex Rel. Bartlow v. BrinkmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Jane L. v. Rodney B.New York City Family Court · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.