Hepfel v. Bashaw
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
The appeal by the County of St. Louis and Marjorie Caroline Erickson, represented by the St. Louis County Attorney, was consolidated with Hepfel v. Bashaw, decided June 11, 1976, and now before the court on rehearing, to reconsider and determine the question of whether an indigent defendant in a paternity action is entitled to court-appointed counsel where the complainant mother is represented by the county attorney pursuant to Minn.St. 257.254. 1 Pending a legislative resolution, and in view of not only the mother’s and putative father’s interests but also of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gomez v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Corra v. CollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- In Re the Welfare of J.B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. LefthandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Graves v. DaughertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.