Dear v. Varnum
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This is an action to recover back certain taxes upon personal property paid by the plaintiff to the defendant as tax collector of San Diego County under protest.
The complaint alleges, in substance, that the assessment of plaintiff’s personal property for taxes for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1887, was illegal and void, for the reason that it did not show the “number, kind, amount, and quality” of the personal property attempted to be assessed; that on or about the sixteenth day of Feb*88ruary, 1888, the delinquent tax list for theprecedingfiscal year had come into the hands of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Bucknall v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- City & County of San Francisco v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Cadwalader v. NashCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Wills v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Southern Service Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- E. E. McCalla Co. v. SleeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Smith v. AddiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.