Legal Opinion

People v. Farnam

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2002No. S010808PublishedCited by 253 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Defendant Jack Gus Famam was convicted by a jury of one count of first degree murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a)), 1 one count of rape (§ 261), and one count of sodomy (§ 286). The jury found true the special circumstances that defendant committed the murder while engaged in burglary, robbery, rape, and sodomy (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)), and that defendant previously had been convicted of first degree murder (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(2)). After a penalty trial, the jury returned a verdict of death and the trial court imposed that sentence. Appeal to this court is automatic. (§ 1239,…

2Cases cited139 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by253 opinions

  1. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. AvilaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. YeomanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003

248 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API