Legal Opinion

Northwestern Stevedoring Co. v. Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1930No. 5980PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERRIGAN, District Judge.

Appellants, a stevedoring company, and its insurer under the Longshoremen’s and Harborworkers’ Compensation Act (44 Stat. 1424 [33 USCA §§ 901-950]), filed a bill of complaint seeking to suspend and set aside an award of compensation in favor of Martin Matheson, an employee of the stevedoring company. Appellees are the employee and the deputy commissioner for the Fourteenth compensation district under that act.'

Review of compensation orders by the filing of such a bill is provided for by section 21 of the Longshoremen’s and Harborworkers’ Compensation Act (44 Stat.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Joyce v. UNITED STATES DEPUTY COMMISSIONER FOR FIRST COMPENSATION DIST.District Court, D. Maine · 1929
  2. Obrecht-Lynch Corporation v. ClarkDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1929
  3. Sanitary Reduction Works v. California Reduction Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1899
  4. Huntington v. City of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902
  5. Huntington v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ross-Whitney Corp. v. Smith Kline & French LaboratoriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  2. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  3. Douds v. Local 294, International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1947
  4. Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
  5. Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API