Legal Opinion

Obrecht-Lynch Corporation v. Clark

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 2, 1929No. 1377PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM C. COLEMAN, District Judge.

This is a proceeding for review of a compensation order under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act. Ac March 4, 1927, chapter 509 (33 USCA § 901). Complainant, the ObrechtLynch Corporation, employed one Alonzo V. Kimbel as a repairman on the steamship' City of Flint. While so engaged on December 22, 1927, he was injured by a heavy tank covering falling against his left leg, causing contusions above and below the knee. As a result, he required medical treatment and was confined to his bed for about one week. On January 6th, 14 days after…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Parsons v. Bedford, Breedlove, & RobesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  5. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wheeling Corrugating Co. v. McManigalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  2. Hunt v. Bank Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
  3. Kropp v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1934
  4. Northwestern Stevedoring Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  5. Rothschild & Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API