Legal Opinion
Twin Harbor Stevedoring & Tug Co. v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 14, 1939No. 8976PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, employer and its insurance carrier, brought suit by filing a so-called bill of complaint invoking § 21(b) of the. Longshoremen’s ánd Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 921(b), to set aside an award of the deputy commissioner. The appeal • is from a decree of dismissal following a motion to dismiss addressed to appellants’ bill.
*515The facts pleaded disclose that claimant, Hugo, was employed as a stevedore foreman at a monthly salary of $325. In December, 1935, while he was at work on board a steamship, a pair of tongs attached to a cable became…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Marshall v. Andrew F. Mahony Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Air America, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, and Joseph F. KerchCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Kobilkin v. PillsburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Burley Welding Works, Inc. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Iacone v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Voris v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.