Sanitary Reduction Works v. California Reduction Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
On Order to Show Cause Why an Injunction Pendente Lite should not Issue.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This is an order to show cause why an injunction pendente lite should not issue. Complainant’s hill is. brought to secure an injunction restraining respondents from carrying away, outside of the city and county of San Francisco, certain garbage and other enumerated materials collected therein, of which complainant claims exclusive right to dispose; also, for the sum of $25,000 as damages for infringement of complainant’s rights. Complainant’s bill alleges that it is a corporation duly organized under the laws of California, and that the respondent corporation is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Butchers' Benevolent Ass'n v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Georgia v. BrailsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1792
- Walker v. JamesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- North Chicago City Railway Co. v. Town of Lake ViewIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Board of Health v. VinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Chew v. First Presbyterian Church of Wilmington, Del., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1916
- Harriman v. Northern Securities Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
- Northwestern Stevedoring Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
- Camors-McConnell Co. v. McConnellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.