Legal Opinion
Harberd v. City of Kettle Falls
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 15, 2004No. 21787-6-IIIPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C.J.
— James and Fumiko Harberd (collectively Mr. Harberd) filed a damages claim against the city of Kettle Falls (City) contending the City reneged on an agreement to let Mr. Harberd hook up his proposed out-of-town housing lots to the City’s water system. The trial court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment. Mr. Harberd does not renew his injunctive relief arguments here, thus they are abandoned. State v. Noah, 103 Wn. App. *50229, 41 n.3, 9 P.3d 858 (2000), review denied, 143 Wn.2d 1014 (2001). After analyzing remaining issues regarding claim filing, statute of limitations, contract, and…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Maier v. GiskeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Maier v. GISKECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Harberd v. City of Kettle FallsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Fabre v. Town of RustonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Libera v. City of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.