Legal Opinion

Lane v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2008No. 80204-1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

194 P.3d 977 (2008)

Arthur T. LANE, Kenneth Gorohoff and Walter L. Williams, individually and on behalf of the class of all persons similarly situated, Respondents/Cross-Appellants,

v.

The CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent/Cross-Respondent,

King County Fire District No. 2; King County Fire District No. 4 (a.k.a. Shoreline Fire Department); North Highline Fire District No. 11; King County Fire District No. 16 (a.k.a. Northshore Fire Department); King County Fire District No. 20; The City of Shoreline, a Washington municipal corporation; and King County, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondents,

The…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Covell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital v. Franklin CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Landmark Development, Inc. v. City of RoyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Okeson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. City of Bonney LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. City of Snoqualmie v. King County Executive Dow ConstantineWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  3. City of Wenatchee v. Chelan County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Willey v. BugdenCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. City of Snoqualmie v. King County Exec. ConstantineWashington Supreme Court · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API