Legal Opinion
Harberd v. City of Kettle Falls
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 26, 2004No. 21787-6-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
84 P.3d 1241 (2004)
James W. and Fumiko T. HARBERD, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
CITY OF KETTLE FALLS, a Municipal Corporation, Respondent.
No. 21787-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Eight.
January 15, 2004.
Publication Ordered February 26, 2004.
Chris A. Montgomery, Montgomery Law Firm, Colville, WA, for Appellant(s).
Stephen M. Lamberson, Kevin W. Mickey, Etter, McMahon, Lamberson & Clary PC, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
BROWN, C.J.
James and Fumiko Harberd (collectively Mr. Harberd) filed a damages claim against the City of Kettle Falls (City) contending the City reneged…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- LaMon v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Yakima County (West Valley) Fire Protection District No. 12 v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Maier v. GISKECourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Fabre v. Town of RustonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Libera v. City of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Champagne v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Champagne v. Thurston CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.