Rhoades v. K-Mart Corp.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CARDINE, Justice.
Mary Rhoades (Rhoades) sued the K-Mart Corporation (K-Mart) after she slipped and fell in K-Mart’s Casper, Wyoming store. The trial court directed a verdict for K-Mart. Rhoades appeals from the judgment entered on the directed verdict asserting that genuine issues of fact existed which precluded a directed verdict and arguing that the trial court erred in refusing to admit certain testimony.
We reverse.
Rhoades presents the following issues:
Did the Trial Court err when it granted Appellee’s (Defendant below) Motion for a directed verdict? Was there sufficient evidence for this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pimentel v. Roundup CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Jasko v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- McCabe v. R.A. Manning Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Buttrey Food Stores Division v. CoulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.