Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. K-Mart Corp.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1993No. 93-38PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Mary Rhoades (Rhoades) sued the K-Mart Corporation (K-Mart) after she slipped and fell in K-Mart’s Casper, Wyoming store. The trial court directed a verdict for K-Mart. Rhoades appeals from the judgment entered on the directed verdict asserting that genuine issues of fact existed which precluded a directed verdict and arguing that the trial court erred in refusing to admit certain testimony.

We reverse.

Rhoades presents the following issues:

Did the Trial Court err when it granted Appellee’s (Defendant below) Motion for a directed verdict? Was there sufficient evidence for this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pimentel v. Roundup CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Jasko v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. McCabe v. R.A. Manning Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Buttrey Food Stores Division v. CoulsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Marie Saldana v. Kmart Corporation Marie Saldana, in No. 99-4055Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wilks v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API