Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
This appeal requires us to decide what facts and circumstances give rise to a plaintiffs right to recover under the mode of operation rule, an exception to the traditional premises liability doctrine, which dispenses with the requirement that a plaintiff prove that a business owner had actual or constructive notice *416of the specific unsafe condition giving rise to the plaintiffs injury. The defendant, Big Y Foods, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, awarding damages to the plaintiff, Leo A. Fisher III, for injuries he sustained…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
- Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Deere & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- O'Connor v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Markley v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.