Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Big Y Foods, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 21, 2010No. SC 18406PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROGERS, C. J.

This appeal requires us to decide what facts and circumstances give rise to a plaintiffs right to recover under the mode of operation rule, an exception to the traditional premises liability doctrine, which dispenses with the requirement that a plaintiff prove that a business owner had actual or constructive notice *416of the specific unsafe condition giving rise to the plaintiffs injury. The defendant, Big Y Foods, Inc., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, awarding damages to the plaintiff, Leo A. Fisher III, for injuries he sustained…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Corbin v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  4. Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
  5. Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. FGA, INC. v. GiglioNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Deere & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  4. O'Connor v. LarocqueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  5. Markley v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API