Legal Opinion

Pimentel v. Roundup Company

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1983No. 49155-1PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPearson, J.

Defendant Roundup Company (d/b/a Fred Meyer Store) appeals a decision of the Court of Appeals reversing a defense verdict in an action for injuries caused when a paint can fell on plaintiff's foot.

The case presents two issues. The first issue is whether plaintiff, in order to establish liability, must show that the operator of a self-service style store had actual or constructive notice of the specific unsafe condition in the store which caused plaintiff's injury. We hold that where the operating procedures of any store are such that unreasonably dangerous conditions are continuous or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wollerman v. Grand Union Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  2. Ciminski v. Finn Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  3. Jasko v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Memel v. ReimerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Strack v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Owens v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
  2. Iwai v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Iwai v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Lynne Woods-Leber and Anthony Leber v. Hyatt Hotels of Puerto Rico, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  5. Rufer v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API