Cargill, Inc. v. Mountain Cement Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Justice.
In these consolidated appeals, we are asked to address theories of express and implied warranties arising out a jury verdict in favor of Mountain Cement Company and Salt Creek Welding and against Cargill Incorporated. The district court reduced the jury verdict by the amount Mountain Cement Company and Salt Creek Welding recovered from other defendants who settled prior to trial. These appeals require us to apply Wyoming’s Uniform Commercial Code; review jury instructions, both given and refused; consider the denial of a request for further discovery; and consider the damages…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Edna Goldstein v. Robert E. Kelleher, United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Allen v. AllenWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Herbert Construction Company, Cross-Appellant v. Continental Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Mehring v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Feiger, Collison & Killmer v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Carlton v. CarltonWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Essex Holding, LLC v. Basic Props., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.