Legal Opinion

Bumgarner & Bowman Builders, Inc. v. Hollar

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 17, 1969No. 6925SC501PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

The record and brief contained no assignments of error as required by Rules 19(c) and 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina. This failure to comply with the rules would in this case ordinarily present for review only errors appearing on the face of the record proper. Trust Co. v. Henry, 267 N.C. 263, 148 S.E. 2d 7 (1966). We have, nevertheless, considered the exceptions listed in the record.

The primary question presented by plaintiff’s exceptions is whether the shed being constructed violates the restrictions contained in the deed, specifically paragraphs 2, 4 and 5…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Long v. BranhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Hoskins v. HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Hullett v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. ANSON BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. HenrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South Shore Homes Ass'n v. Holland Holiday'sSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Erthal v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  3. Erthal v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. In re Last Will & Testament of HowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API