Hoskins v. Hoskins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The inquiry on this appeal is whether the court below erred in taxing costs. The judgment directs the payment of all costs and attorneys’ fees from the fund of $17,500 belonging to plaintiff and defendant in common, before division of the fund between them. Thus, the costs are apportioned between the parties, and attorneys’ fees are made a part of the court costs.
The apportionment of the compensation for a referee and the court reporter employed by him is within the discretionary power given the court by G.S. 6-21(6). Tyser v. Sears, 252 N.C. 65, 112 S.E. 2d 750.
If an action is equitable in.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wooten v. . WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Horner v. Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Chandler v. . CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Kluttz v. . AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Parton v. . BoydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
- Hicks v. AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Dixon, Odom & Co. v. SledgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- United Artists Records, Inc. v. Eastern Tape Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- In Re the Appeal of KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.