Legal Opinion

Hullett v. Grayson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 13, 1965No. 290PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Plaintiffs sue for a mandatory injunction to require defendants to remove from their (defendants’) property a garage. Plaintiffs allege that the structure violates a restrictive covenant which rims with the land.

Plaintiffs own Lot 9 in Block A, and defendants own Lot 3 in Block A, of a subdivision as shown on a map recorded in Map Book 7, at page 593, Registry of Mecklenburg County. Defendants’ residence is located on their lot. Plaintiffs’ and defendants’ lots are subject to restrictive covenants, among others the following:

“No temporary building, garage, garage apartment or…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cummings v. Dosam, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. South Shore Homes Ass'n v. Holland Holiday'sSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Beech Mountain Property Owner's Ass'n v. SeifartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. Snug Harbor Property Owners Ass'n v. CurranCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Harry v. Crescent Resources, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API