Legal Opinion

Long v. Branham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 25, 1967No. 852PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

The question posed is this: Do the restrictions which provide that no lot in Timbercrest Subdivision “shall be used except for residential purposes” prevent an owner from constructing across a part of his lot within the subdivision a roadway connecting a street in Timbercrest with one in the adjoining subdivision of Oak Hill, which is protected by restrictions substantially similar to those of Timbercrest? “Whether or not the maintenance, use, or grant of a right-of-way over restricted property is a violation of the restriction depends largely upon the language of the restriction, the objects…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Callaham v. ArensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Rock-Ola Manufacturing Corp. v. Music & Television Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. Laughlin v. WagnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Reed v. ElmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Thompson v. SquibbDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. McCrann v. Pinehurst, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Armstrong v. Ledges Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Stegall v. Housing Authority of the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API