Legal Opinion

Erthal v. May

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 2012No. COA12-603PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STROUD, Judge.

The parties to this case are all homeowners in the Stirrup Downs development, an equestrian community. Charles M. Erthal, Delores Erthal, Jerome A. Budde, Jr., and llena T. Budde (“plaintiffs”) brought this action seeking an injunction preventing Fredrick B. May and Francine L. Appel, a/k/a Francine L. May (“defendants”) from making any commercial use of their land to board horses at their operation known as Serenity Acres. The trial court granted summary judgment allowing the injunction, and defendants appeal. For the following reasons, we reverse in part and remand for entry…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Harris v. Ray Johnson Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Griffith v. Glen Wood Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. French Broad Place, LLC v. Asheville Sav. BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Evans v. Pitt County Department of Social ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
  3. Harris v. Testar, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. Buckner v. TigerSwan, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  5. Buysse v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API