Legal Opinion

In re Dack

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1979PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Robert H. Wagner, J.

Petitioner, Harold Back, has made application pursuant to CPLR 3102 (subd [c]) permitting discovery before commencement of an action in order to (1) aid him in the framing of a complaint and (2) identify additional defendants. The respondents1 oppose the application on various grounds including that the discovery requested is overbroad and burdensome, the *492petitioner has failed to establish a good cause of action and petitioner has failed to establish the materiality and necessity of the discovery sought. In addition, respondents contend that the First…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. In re WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Wolf v. PeopleNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Torre v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. In re Houlihan-ParnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. PPM America, Inc. v. Marriott Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
  2. Solargen Electric Motor Car Corp. v. American Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1981
  3. In re TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. People v. KorkalaNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In re MacDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API