Legal Opinion

City of Buffalo v. Hanna Furnace Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1953PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

The issue here presented is whether an officer or agent of the state or of a state agency may be examined as a witness before trial, under the conditions specified in section 288 of the Civil Practice Act, in an action to which neither state, state agency nor such officer or agent is a party. Both courts below — with one justice dissenting in the Appellate Division — have concluded that the statute affords no authority for such examination.

Section 288, besides permitting the pretrial examination of any party at the instance of any other party, provides for the taking of the testimony before…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. Sonya Evette SingletonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  2. Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Eggers v. KennySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  4. United States v. LoweryDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1998
  5. Southbridge Finishing Co. v. GoldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API