Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

McCluney v. Zap Professional Photography, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 26, 1995No. 1921959, 1930061PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

This action was filed by Zap Professional Photography, Inc., against George McCluney, d/b/a Flash Photographic Services ("Flash"), claiming intentional interference with business and contractual relations and a civil conspiracy in furtherance thereof. Zap sought damages and injunctive relief. Flash counterclaimed, alleging illegal restraint of trade and monopolization under §§ 8-10-3 and 6-5-60, Ala. Code 1975, and intentional interference with business or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Super Valu Stores, Inc. v. PetersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Sterling Oil of Oklahoma, Inc. v. PackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  4. Utah Foam Products, Inc. v. Polytec, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Paris v. Buckner Feed Mill, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Tuscaloosa v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. White Sands Group, L.L.C. v. Prs II, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. SB v. Saint James SchoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  4. Thomas v. WilliamsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Vandenberg v. Aramark Educational Services, Inc., 1100557 (Ala. 9-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API