Legal Opinion

Vandenberg v. Aramark Educational Services, Inc., 1100557 (Ala. 9-30-2011)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 30, 2011No. 1100557, 1100560, and 1100561PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STUART, Justice.

On August 11, 2010, students and former students (hereinafter referred to as “the students”) of the University of Alabama (“UA”), Auburn University (“Auburn”), and the University of Alabama at Birmingham (“UAB”) (hereinafter referred to collectively as “the universities”) filed three separate class-action lawsuits in the Jefferson Circuit Court challenging the legality of so-called “dining-dollars” programs implemented by the universities and pursuant to which all undergraduate students are required to pay a mandatory dining fee each semester, which is then credited back to…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Siegert v. GilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Parker v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Teplick v. MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  2. Alabama State University v. DanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
  3. S.K. v. Montgomery County Board of EducationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  4. Board of School Commissioners v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2012
  5. Health Care Authority for Baptist Health v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API