Legal Opinion
Utah Foam Products, Inc. v. Polytec, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 21, 1991No. 89-767PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
Utah Foam Products, Inc. (hereinafter "Utah Foam") appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict assessing damages in favor of Polytec, Inc., and Phil Cashion in the amount of $30,731 on their claims of unjust enrichment, and a total of $375,000 on their claims of tortious interference with a business relationship and misrepresentation. We affirm as to the award based on the claims of tortious interference with a business relationship and misrepresentation;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gross v. Lowder Rlty. Better Homes & GardensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Sparks v. McCrearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Lowder Realty, Inc. v. OdomSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Burgess Min. & Const. Corp. v. LeesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Polytec, Inc. v. Utah Foam Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. HeilmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- White Sands Group, L.L.C. v. Prs II, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Mantiply v. MantiplySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- SB v. Saint James SchoolSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.