Legal Opinion

United States v. Gunter

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 29, 1993No. ACMR 9300014PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GONZALES, Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was found guilty, by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, of absence without leave, failure to obey a lawful general regulation, wrongful appropriation, four specifications of larceny, and two specifications of forgery, in violation of Articles 86, 92, 121, and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 886, 892, 921, and 923 (1988) [hereinafter UCMJ], The appellant was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-eight months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. WeissUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. BirdsongU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  2. United States v. GunterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. KelleyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1994
  4. United States v. GunterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API