Legal Opinion

People v. Bartges

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 3, 1954No. Crim. 5126PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT

In two separate amended informations filed by the district attorney of Los Angeles County, defendant was accused of the crimes of forgery and grand theft.

The amended informations also charged that the accused previously had been convicted of arson, larceny and larceny by bailee, and grand theft. He was -tried and convicted of both crimes and judgments were entered on September 1, 1953, wherein it was stated that the allegations of prior convictions alleged in the information were true.

Defendant appealed from the judgments of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. In Re RothrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. BartgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Southwestern Investment Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Markwort v. McGeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re BartgesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. In Re BartgesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re BartgesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. MutchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. People v. MutchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API