Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Bartges

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1955No. Crim. 5643Published

1DissentTraynor, J.

I dissent.

Petitioner was convicted of one count of forgery and one count of grand theft, and it was found in the judgment of conviction that he had suffered three prior felony convictions, although two of the three priors charged against him had been dismissed on motion of the district attorney before the ease was submitted to the jury. Probation was denied, and it was ordered that the sentences on the primary counts should run consecutively. Petitioner appealed. The judgment was affirmed and became final. (People v. Bartges, 126 Cal.App.2d 763 [273 P.2d 49]. No petition for hearing was filed…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. In Re BellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. CraigCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API