Legal Opinion

In Re Bartges

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1955No. Crim. 5643PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

In this habeas corpus proceeding the ultimate question is whether the District Court of Appeal, after modifying consecutive sentence judgments in two consolidated criminal cases by striking out findings of two prior convictions, has power to itself implicitly determine upon the changed record whether probation shall be granted or denied and whether the sentences shall run cumulatively or concurrently, or must remand the cause to the trial court for such determinations and appropriate proceedings. We conclude that petitioner is entitled to the writ, not to be discharged from custody of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re McVickersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. In Re JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. In Re McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re NewbernCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Amos Marshall Arketa v. Lawrence E. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. In Re HernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API