Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Mutch

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1971No. Crim. 14182Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SULLIVAN, J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I agree with the majority that a defendant whose conviction of a violation of Penal Code section 209 became final before our decision in People v. Daniels (1969) 71 Cal.2d 1119 [80 Cal.Rptr. 897, 459 P.2d 225] is entitled to post-conviction relief “if there is no material dispute as to the facts relating to his conviction and if it appears that the statute under which he was convicted did not prohibit his conduct.” (Italics added.) (In re Zerbe (1964) 60 Cal.2d. 666, 668 [36 Cal.Rptr. 286, 388 P.2d 182, 10 A.L.R.3d 840].) Accordingly, applying the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In re ZerbeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In re ShippCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. TimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API