Legal Opinion
Jachetta v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 2011No. 10-35175PublishedCited by 108 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
In 1971, William Carlo Jachetta applied for a 160-acre Native allotment comprised of two parcels (Parcel A and Parcel B) but, because of an error of the United States government, his application was initially processed only as a request for Parcel A, which the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) issued to Jachetta in 1986. In 2004, after long and complicated administrative proceedings, the BLM finally issued Jachetta his allotment for Parcel B. By this time, however, Parcel B had been used as a “material site” by the State of Alaska Department of Transportation…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Mark Munns v. John F. KerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Williams v. Utah Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States v. RizkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Edward Zadrozny v. Bank of New York MellonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.