State v. Corkran
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
In seeking a reversal of the judgment below, defendant advances three assignments of error claimed to be prejudicial.
First, he asserts that the trial court erroneously overruled his motion to require the prosecuting attorney to make available to him before trial for inspection and examination an oral statement he had given some months before trial concerning the stolen merchandise and his connection therewith, which statement had been reduced to writing and was in the possession of the prosecuting attorney.
In support of such claim defendant relies on Section 2317.33, Revised Code, found in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. FoxOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. YeomanOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. CalaOhio Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. WoullardOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. GusterOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. NelsonOhio Supreme Court · 1973
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.