State v. Cala

*98OPINION

By MATTHEWS, J.

The appellants were found guilty of rape and sodomy. In their briefs in this court they make the concession that “The facts upon which the indictment is predicated conclusively show that on the night in question, the prosecutrix, a young lady 25 years of age, was subjected to three separate and distinct attacks,” etc. There is, therefore, no issue in this court as to the sufficiency of the proof of the corpus delicti.

The jury found that the defendants were the perpetrators — personally or vicariously — of these attacks. They assail that finding, claiming that it…