Legal Opinion

State v. Fox

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1938No. 26722PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtZimmmerman, J.

Section 13442-11, General Code of Ohio, provides:

“When two or more persons are jointly indicted for a felony, except a capital offense, they shall be tried jointly unless the court for good cause shown on application therefor by the prosecuting attorney or one or more of said defendants, order that one or more of said defendants be tried separately.”

This is a valid enactment under the decisions in the cases of Beazell v. State, 269 U. S., 167, 70 L. Ed., 216 46 S. Ct., 68; Beazell v. State, 111 Ohio St., 838, 146 N. E., 316, and Chatfield v. State, 111 Ohio St., 839, 146 N. E., 315.

Under…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Commonwealth v. MillenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. People v. DoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Browning v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1929
  5. People v. BuckminsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Pang v. MinchOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. MurphyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Thurston v. MaxwellOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. City of Columbus v. AleshireOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. State v. DuffyOhio Supreme Court · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API