Legal Opinion

State v. White

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1968No. 41142PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*148I.

Schneider, J.

Upon consideration of the conflicting testimony in the record, we subscribe to the finding of the trial court that defendant’s oral confession preceded public defender Frank Petrancek’s request to see the defendant and any inducement on the part of Dorothy Berts and the police to obtain the oral confession. Furthermore, there is no corroborating evidence supporting defendant’s contention that his request for the assistance of counsel was denied. (Cf. Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478, 481, 12 L. Ed. 2d 977, where the police denied petitioner’s request to see counsel, denied…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. State v. LottOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HunterOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API